Wheeler indicates to Sprint that he?s skeptical of merger
Sprint Chairman Masayoshi Son and Chief Executive Dan Hesse got a meeting with FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler on Monday. They wanted to convince Wheeler and the FCC to look favorably at their potential takeover of rival T-Mobile.
Wheeler and the FCC made no public statement – as is FCC policy concerning mergers. According to news reports, Wheeler said he’d keep an open mind, but a Reuters source said that he was more inclined to support “comments made last week by antitrust chief William Baer, who gave long odds to a regulatory approval of mergers between any two of the top four wireless phone companies.” In other words, probably not.
Discouraging regulators haven’t stopped Masayoshi Son from continuing to talk to T-Mobile, but both parties know they face an uphill battle in Washington.
Moreover, Sprint and T-Mobile seem to be losing in the court of public opinion. In a strongly worded opinion piece, Fierce Wireless editor Phil Goldstein laid out reasons for opposing the deal.
- A Sprint/T-Mobile merger is unlikely to get past regulators, and thus will be a waste of time.
- It would completely scramble plans for the upcoming spectrum auctions.
- It would distract management from other priorities, especially at Sprint.
- It would be immensely complicated to combine the two networks.
- A merger might remove T-Mobile’s “uncarrier” ways from the market; in other words, their recent price-cutting competitive moves.
- It likely would not lead to a company with enough clout to challenge Verizon and AT&T.
Speed Matters agrees with Goldstein and adds that neither company has shown respect enough for workers or consumers to earn approval.
FCC chief tells Sprint chair he is skeptical on T-Mobile deal (Reuters, Feb. 3, 2013)
6 reasons the Sprint/T-Mobile merger is a terrible idea (Phil Goldstein, FierceWireless, Jan. 29, 2014)
TCGplayer workers rally for livable wages and launch a report on poverty-level wages at the eBay subsidiary
Apple retail workers in Oklahoma City win first collective contract with CWA
Labor and public interest groups defend FCC's broadcast ownership rules promoting competition, diversity, and localism on air